Return data from SBF programs

Problem

In the Solidity language it is permitted to return any number of values from a function, for example a variable length string can be returned:

function foo1() public returns (string) {
    return "Hello, world!\n";
}

Multiple values, arrays and structs are permitted too.

struct S {
    int f1;
    bool f2
};

function foo2() public returns (string, int[], S) {
    return (a, b, c);
}

All the return values are eth abi encoded to a variable-length byte array.

On ethereum errors can be returned too:

function withdraw() public {
    require(msg.sender == owner, "Permission denied");
}

function failure() public {
    revert("I afraid I can't do that dave");
}

These errors help the developer debug any issue they are having, and can also be caught in a Solidity try .. catch block. Outside of a try .. catch block, any of these would cause the transaction or rpc to fail.

Existing solution

The existing solution that Solang uses, writes the return data to the callee account data. The caller's account cannot be used, since the callee may not be the same SBF program, so it will not have permission to write to the callee's account data.

Another solution would be to have a single return data account which is passed around through CPI. Again this does not work for CPI as the callee may not have permission to write to it.

The problem with this solution is:

It does not work for RPC calls
It is very racey; a client has to submit the Tx and then retrieve the account data. This is not atomic so the return data can be overwritten by another transaction.

Requirements for Solution

It must work for:

RPC: An RPC should be able to return any number of values without writing to account data
Transaction: An transaction should be able to return any number of values without needing to write them account data
CPI: The callee must "set" return value, and the caller must be able to retrieve it.

Review of other chains

Ethereum (EVM)

The RETURN opcode allows a contract to set a buffer as a returndata. This opcode takes a pointer to memory and a size. The REVERT opcode works similarly but signals that the call failed, and all account data changes must be reverted.

For CPI, the caller can retrieve the returned data of the callee using the RETURNDATASIZE opcode which returns the length, and the RETURNDATACOPY opcode, which takes a memory destination pointer, offset into the returndata, and a length argument.

Ethereum stores the returndata in blocks.

Parity Substrate

The return data can be set using the seal_return(u32 flags, u32 pointer, u32 size) syscall.

Flags can be 1 for revert, 0 for success (nothing else defined)
Function does not return

CPI: The seal_call() syscall takes pointer to buffer and pointer to buffer size where return data goes

There is a 32KB limit for return data.

Parity Substrate does not write the return data to blocks.

Rejected Solution

The concept of ephemeral accounts has been proposed a solution for this. This would certainly work for the CPI case, but this would not work RPC or Transaction case.

Proposed Solution

The callee can set the return data using a new system call sol_set_return_data(buf: *const u8, length: u64). There is a limit of 1024 bytes for the returndata. This function can be called multiple times, and will simply overwrite what was written in the last call.

The return data can be retrieved with sol_get_return_data(buf: *mut u8, length: u64, program_id: *mut Pubkey) -> u64. This function copies the return buffer, and the program_id that set the return data, and returns the length of the return data, or 0 if no return data is set. In this case, program_id is not set.

When an instruction calls sol_invoke(), the return data of the callee is copied into the return data of the current instruction. This means that any return data is automatically passed up the call stack, to the callee of the current instruction (or the RPC call).

Note that sol_invoke() clears the returns data before invoking the callee, so that any return data from a previous invoke is not reused if the invoked fails to set a return data. For example:

A invokes B
Before entry to B, return data is cleared.0
B sets some return data and returns
A invokes C
Before entry to C, return data is cleared.
C does not set return data and returns
A checks return data and finds it empty

Another scenario to consider:

A invokes B
B invokes C
C sets return data and returns
B does not touch return data and returns
A gets return data from C
A does not touch return data
Return data from transaction is what C set.

The compute costs are calculated for getting and setting the return data using the syscalls.

For a normal RPC or Transaction, the returndata is base64-encoded and stored along side the sol_log strings in the stable log.

Note on returning errors

Solidity on Ethereum allows the contract to return an error in the return data. In this case, all the account data changes for the account should be reverted. On Solana, any non-zero exit code for a SBF program means the entire transaction fails. We do not wish to support an error return by returning success and then returning an error in the return data. This would mean we would have to support reverting the account data changes; this too expensive both on the VM side and the SBF contract side.

Errors will be reported via sol_log.

Return data from SBF programs

Problem​

Existing solution​

Requirements for Solution​

Review of other chains​

Ethereum (EVM)​

Parity Substrate​

Rejected Solution​

Proposed Solution​

Note on returning errors​